Nuclear Geometry Website -- 3D!


This is a not a commercial website. No ads, no pop-ups, no scripts, not even a hit counter.

Welcome to the Home of Colliding Corpuscular String Theory (CCST):


The ONLY String Theory that makes Definite, Testable Predictions!

Also Presented: N-Ice Theory and the Pop-Fizz Cosmology

CCST defines nuclear structure (most of what is presented on this website), resolves the disconnect between relativity and quantum gravity, redefining mass as a product of the recoils of courier photons exchanging angular momentum with charged surfaces, emulating the theoretical Higgs mechanism in the process, and predicts an exotic core object of "nuclear ice" for the universe that is still melting into hydrogen gas. (Effectively telling us where we will find all the "missing mass," and also why the universe is accelerating in its expansion.)

I even take a pot-shot at pointing out a candidate spherical hard X-Ray object in the ROSAT sky survey, noting that space is flat most places we look, but over yonder behind the Milky Way's core is a really big hill in space-time, and this thing is right at the heart of it. (See String Basics.)


Polar View of Boron 10.
Stereo Polar View: Nuclear Structure of Boron 10, (Z=5 Outer Shell, N=5 Inner Shell)

The nuclear structure problem has puzzled physicists for nearly a century. I've spent over 30 years working on this problem myself. I had an idea back in 1978 that electrons had a string attached to them to explain the behaviour of magnetic fields and Cooper pairs. I theorized that electrons might be some kind of knotting in the string. I extended that idea to the nuclear structure problem. I felt that the electron orbitals around atomic nuclei were too orderly, constrained to particular configurations by the atomic nucleus they enveloped, and that those orbitals should be predictable from nuclear considerations alone. I worked for many years reverse-engineering the nucleus from those electron orbitals, seeking a system of geometry that would correctly define nuclear structure as well as predicting the electron orbital configurations. I am pleased to present here some of the results of my research. I believe that the nuclear structure problem is essentially solved, and I present this data in the hope that chemists and physicists will be able to confirm the nuclear structural models. There is still a great deal of work to be done, as I have only been able to generate solution sets to the lightest elements and their isotopes with my crude modeling techniques. Still, I believe the solution sets I have found give extremely compelling evidence that the laws of nuclear geometry I have proposed are valid, and yield accurate results. Not only does this string theory (colliding corpuscular string theory) predict the location of "up" and "down" quarks in the proton and neutron nuclear shells, it also predicts the locations of "p" and hybridized electron orbitals in the atomic configurations of the various isotopes. The system of nuclear geometry starts from a simple set of rules, yet it builds to complexity very rapidly as more shells are stacked within the nucleus to yield more massive nucleons. One of the more surprising discoveries of CCST is that the nucleus must contain shells of electrons interleaved with the proton and neutron shells in heavy nuclei. (Electrons are not point particles in this theory, electrons have a leptonic quark structure displayed in an orthogonally rotated space-time metric.) Even the lightweight helium nucleus is predicted to have an internalized electron shell of two snuggled in the nuclear interior. Essentially all non-valence electrons will be found composited into electron shells in the nuclear interior, they will most likely interleave between otherwise adjacent proton shells. I have not bothered to construct the electron shells, only solved proton and neutron shells are presented on this website. Electron shells are solved for much as proton shells with an opposite charge character, and several of the proton shells given can be directly converted to represent solutions for electron shells. Pinned vector bosons are handled slightly differently for electron shells, and I'm not sure at this point if electron shells in the nuclear interior are able to pin external strings. As I said, there is still a great deal of work to be done.


Students & Educators Welcome!

Polar View of the Proton Shell of Carbon.
Polar View: Proton Shell of Carbon
String Basics (Corpuscles of Light: The Ultimate Building Block)
Chemists (Nuclear Structure Intro & Important Stuff.)
Key to Nuclear Models (What am I seeing?)
Nuclear Shells (No, they are not molecules!)
Empirical Laws (The Rules of Nuclear Geometry.)
How to Build Them (Try it, you'll like it!)
Mensuration (Calculating Loop Values.)
Glossary (Terminology of Nuclear Geometry.)
Mirrors, Strings and Manifolds (Cosmological Foundations of CCST. C1994)

The A.S.R.O.C.M. (Is Reality a Simulation?)

3D Viewing (Stereogram Viewing Aids.)


With the larger stereograms, the optimum screen resolution for this website is now 1024x768.
(Update Note, 21FEB2008: Enhanced the stereograms for clearer image on dim and older monitors.)


05 JULY 2012: Well, I guess congratulations are in order for Dr. Higgs. I'm a little disappointed myself, I was gambling the Higgs Boson did not exist, because the Higgs field already had a name, it's just very poorly understood, largely because of a centuries worth of academic arrogance. Perhaps a bit of explanation is in order, you see, for 40 years I have been complaining that the theory of charge is not a complete theory. Acadamia says it is, and you risk your career if you challenge that notion. So, to explain the additional activities of the charge phenomenon that Maxwell did not elaborate mathematically, they had to create a new field that would have just those properties required to give a particle mass, but they couldn't say it had anything to do with charge, because that might be embarrasing to Academia. So, now we have two names for the phenomenon of charge and its intrinsic interactions, we have the charge field, poorly understood, doing work and engaging in action at a distance with no courier particle, and we have the Higgs field, which takes all those little details we skipped over mathematically in our "complete" theory of charge and attributes them to this new luminiferous ether that we convinced ourselves didn't exist with a couple of flawed experiments a century ago. Yes, that's right, we've resurrected the luminiferous ether, and that's a good thing, because the Michelson-Morley experiment had an inherent flaw in it. Charge creates an ether wind, and ultimately will cause ether drag effects. The experiment was designed by men who did not know that charge has a profound influence on the luminiferous ether. It was there, but they couldn't see the effect they were looking for due to an ether drag effect, and they wrongly concluded that there was no ether. The Higgs field is the luminiferous ether. Check out the links for the "String Basics" and "MSM" pages above if you want a more complete understanding of where physics went wrong. --Jim Barzydlo

17 DEC 2012: Oh my, two Higgs bosons! Exactly what you would expect to see if the corpuscular "Higgs" field is actually the mislabled fields of the charge couriers. The version in lepton space decays into two photons composed of lepton string, the version in hadron space decays into two Z bosons, likely made of hadron string.


www.StringTheory.com

www.CollidingStrings.org

Copyrights 1997, 1999, 2002, 2008 by Arnold J. Barzydlo

Legal Notes: There have been No Taxpayer Dollars and No Government Grants. All work was written, produced, funded, built, photographed, scanned, edited, copyrighted, HTML-coded, and released by the author. The author retains intellectual property rights and copyrights on this material.


E-Mail If you wish, you may E-Mail Me.

(The domain name Stringtheory.com is not for sale.)